Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights while respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. To the aforesaid proposition, we are guided via the decision with the Supreme Court in the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court ninety two. 9. The aforesaid exceptions are missing from the present case. In these kinds of circumstances, this petition is found to become not maintainable which is dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more

Delay in recording confessional statement might not be treated fatal for the case of prosecution(Murder Trial)

Therefore, this petition is found to become not maintainable and is also dismissed along with the pending application(s), and the petitioners could search for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not reply to inquiries seeking legal suggestions or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed for the court in which the case continues to be or will be filed.

R.O, Office, Gujranwala as well as the police officials didn't inform him that the identification parade on the accused hasn't been conducted nonetheless. In the moment case, now the accused made an effort to acquire advantage of This system aired by SAMAA News, wherein the image from the petitioner was commonly circulated. The police should not have uncovered the identity with the accused through electronic media. The regulation lends assurance into the accused that the identity should not be subjected to the witnesses, particularly for your witness to identify the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer put a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and generated pics. In addition to, the images shown to the media expose that a mask was not placed over the accused to hide his identity right until he was put up for an identification parade. Making photos on the accused publically, both by showing the same to the witness or by publicizing the same in almost any newspaper or program, would create doubt while in the proceedings from the identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to make certain that there is no likelihood to the witness to begin to see the accused before going to your identification parade. The accused should not be shown towards the witness in person or through any other manner, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or the press or electronic media. Presented the reasons elaborated above, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(2), Cr.P.C.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is additionally a very well-recognized proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is issue towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings within the evidence.

only around the ground of miscases remanded & only around the ground of misreading of evidence only within the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)

Some pluralist systems, for example Scots regulation in Scotland and types of civil law jurisdictions in Quebec and Louisiana, tend not to specifically match into the dual common-civil legislation system classifications. These types of systems may perhaps have been seriously influenced with the Anglo-American common regulation tradition; however, their substantive law is firmly rooted while in the civil regulation tradition.

The law as set up in previous court rulings; like common law, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.

Therefore, this petition is found to suit for partition case law be not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as petitioners may perhaps look for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

When the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may possibly dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a chance to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is normally only done If your employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence along with the petitioner company responded for the allegations as a result they were well mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to get looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more

Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury into a person, by performing an act which during the ordinary course of nature is likely to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently dangerous that it must in all likelihood cause death, causes the death of the such person, is claimed to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”

13309-B of 2010 to be weak types of evidence and also the evidentiary value whereof would be noticed for the time from the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, Consequently, confirmed custody of the petitioner in jail is not likely to serve any valuable purpose at this stage.”

one hundred fifteen . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance in the respondents that pensionary benefits can be withheld on account in the allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section twenty from the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does supply for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension may very well be withheld or reduced. These include if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension could be withheld or reduced. In a few cases, a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established from the government.